Michael Lee Strategy founder Michael Lee joins Varney & Co. to discuss whether the looming government shutdown or the UAW strike will impact the stock market.
Wall Street’s top regulator on Wednesday adopted a new rule cracking down on so-called “greenwashing” and other deceptive or misleading marketing practices by U.S. investment funds.
The changes to the two decades-old Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) “Name Rule” requires that 80% of a fund’s portfolio matches the asset advertised by its name.
It takes aim at a boom in funds that have tried to exploit investor interest in environmental, social and governance, or ESG, investing with names that do not accurately reflect its investments or strategies.
“A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus,” SEC chair Gary Gensler said on Wednesday at a meeting to vote on the rule. “Such truth in advertising promotes fund integrity on behalf of fund investors.”
CHINA RISKS SHOULD GET DISCLOSED BY LARGE US COMPANIES, SAYS FORMER SEC CHAIR
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a new rule cracking down on greenwashing by investment funds. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images / Getty Images)
The SEC since 2021 has also focused on prosecuting ESG-related misconduct and “greenwashing”, bringing enforcement actions and levying fines.
Financial reform advocates say billions of dollars are now invested in popular funds that may actually support fossil fuel production and do not meet the ESG goals suggested by their names, which can change frequently.
The rule also targets funds with names suggesting a focus on particular characteristics, like “growth” and “value,” or particular economic themes or investment strategies, such as artificial intelligence, big data, or health innovation.
FEDERAL JUDGE RULES AGAINST CFPB’S ANTI-DISCRIMINATION EFFORT
ESG investing strategies generally seek to minimize exposure to the fossil fuel industry. (Photographer: Justin Merriman/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)
Funds would also be required to define the terms they use and explain the criteria for selecting investments in their disclosures.
The 80% investment requirement currently applies to other fund characteristics such as risk. As a result of the change, 76% of investment funds would be subject to the “Names Rule” up from the current 60%, SEC officials said prior to the vote.
REGULATORS PROPOSE CHANGES TO ‘LIVING WILLS’ AND DEBT RULES FOR BIG BANKS IN WAKE OF CRISIS
The SEC’s updates to the “Name Rule” require that at least 80% of the fund’s holdings match the name of the fund as a means of protecting investors. ((Photo by Rich Graessle/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) / Getty Images)
Trade organizations have attacked the proposal, first issued in May of last year, claiming its requirements would be impracticably subjective, cause confusion among investors, and encourage superficial judgments based solely on names.
“The rule sweeps more than three-quarters of all the funds in the U.S. into its dragnet, going far beyond ESG funds—the supposed root of the rulemaking—with no justification,” Eric Pan, CEO of the Investment Company Institute, a major Washington funds group, said in a statement on Wednesday.
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
“The only thing that this rule achieves is to insert the SEC deeper into funds’ investment decision-making processes.”
In a concession to industry, the change will allow 90 days, rather than the originally proposed 30, for corrective action if funds fall out of compliance with the 80% standard.
Credit: Source link
